PLEASE HELP!!
Please do not put a file link!
What was one of the most important parts of Abraham Lincoln‘s plan to rebuild south south after the Civil War?
A. Using federal power to help the south and force new black codes
B. Making sure that slavery would not return the south
C. Punishing southern leaders for betraying United States
D. Allowing southern states to control their own affairs
52. How did the concept of Social Darwinism affect the colonists after the war?
Pls answer!!
I’ll mark brainliest!
Explain why the process of industrialization is called a revolution, and summarize the effects of industrialization on the people of the era.
Answer:
The process of industrialization is known as the revolution because it brings new industries and development in a quick session, and also opens up the gate for the other countries to do partnership with the specific country.
Explanation:
thanks me later
John Rolfe introduced what to Jamestown that saved it form certain demise and turned it into a successful settlement? (SSUSH1b)
A
Cotton
B
Sugar Cane
С
Tobacco
D
Indigo
Answer: C
Explanation: Tobacco was a cash crop first discoverde in the new world
Why did Jesus use parables?
A. They included none rules for leading a better life
B. They were part of his Sermon on the Mount
C. They helped clarify the meaning of the Lord's Prayer
D. They helped explain his ideas through simple stories that were easy for everybody to understand.
Answer:
D. They helped explain his ideas through simple stories that were easy for everybody to understand.
Explanation:
Who staged a coup and was known as a tyrant in 561 B.C (Key Figures and
Economies in Ancient Civilizations)
Answer: Peisistratus
Explanation:
why did some Americans feel the articles of confederation was not suffcient for the new nation?
What allowed cities to grow in the tenth and eleventh centuries?
Answer:
Although historians disagree about the extent of the social and material damage caused by the 9th- and 10th-century invasions, they agree that demographic growth began during the 10th century and perhaps earlier. They have also identified signs of the reorganization of lordship and agricultural labour, a process in which members of an order of experienced and determined warriors concentrated control of land in their own hands and coerced a largely free peasantry into subjection. Thus did the idea of the three orders of society—those who fight, those who pray, and those who labour—come into use to describe the results of the ascendancy of the landholding aristocracy and its clerical partners. In cooperation with bishops and ecclesiastical establishments, particularly great monastic foundations such as Cluny (established 910), the nobility of the late 11th and 12th centuries reorganized the agrarian landscape and rural society of western Europe and made it the base of urbanization, which was also well under way in the 11th century.
Which of the following is NOT a way that the ancient cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-daro were similar?
A) Large temples were constructed in each city to honor the gods.
B) They were planned cities filled with structures made from brick.
C) The streets built in each city were based on a grid system.
D) They were protected by thick walls surrounding the cities.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
i dont know if its correct but i hope it helps
How many times smaller is a group of 7 coins than a group of 21 coins?
Answer:
3
Explanation:
if you divide 7 and 21 you get 3 groups and if you 7x3 is 21
The industrialization of the United States and of Japan differed most in that Japan lacked ?
In 2-3 sentences, explain why the United States and Cuba took the actions they did in response to each other during the Cold War.
Answer:
In October 1962, the Soviet provision of ballistic missiles to Cuba led to the most dangerous Cold War confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union and brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Over the course of two extremely tense weeks, US President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev negotiated a peaceful outcome to the crisis. The crisis evoked fears of nuclear destruction, revealed the dangers of brinksmanship, and invigorated attempts to halt the arms race.
Explanation: Sorry I got into it haha;)...But there you go...
GIVING BRAINEST
Which statement describes the state of leadership in the later Ming dynasty?
The people took advantage of the rulers' kindness.
Leaders were older and easily influenced by the young.
O The emperors lived in poverty and declined in social status.
Some emperors were children who were easily influenced.
Answer:
Some emperors were children who were easily influenced.
Explanation:
Answer:
C:
Explanation:
Which statement describes the state of leadership in the later Ming dynasty?
The people took advantage of the rulers’ kindness.
Leaders were older and easily influenced by the young.
The emperors lived in poverty and declined in social status.
Some emperors were children who were easily influenced.
Question 4 of 10
Organizing the battles of the American Civil War according to which
campaign they belong to is an example of which of the following skills?
A. Comparing and contrasting
B. Data analysis
C. Categorization
O D. Sequencing
I need some opinions. what rights given to you by the constitution do you enjoy the most?
Answer:
Well for one i enjoy the right to freedom and for two i enjoy the right to bare arms.
I hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Answer:
The right to bare arms and the freedom of speech
Explanation:
Hope this helps you!! :)
Why did trump want to build a wall, and why did he want the Mexicans to pay for the wall
Answer: This is a very controversial topic but can be learned from. Donald J. Trump built the wall for protection around America. Many Mexican immigrants have been crossing illegally with no passport or identification. Many had one goal and that was to move to a better place where they are free with their families. Others had a goal, that was to smuggle illegal things into America for other American drug dealers and weapon dealers. It was a good move on the presidents part and saved us a whole lot of damage. Yes, it may have affected the Mexican immigrants but because of their actions this wall had to be put up. Now don't get me wrong there are many good well manured Mexican people and I have nothing against them. The wall was really meant for the people who wanted to do harm to America and had no right to be here.
Explanation:
What are some of the negative and positive outcomes of the Industrial Revolution?
Answer:
Positive Effects of the Industrial Revolution The Industrial Revolution led to inventions of new machinery and production processes. Such new inventions made production faster and more economical. For example, the invention of the assembly line helped to make production easier through division of labor and specialization. Due to the more efficient production processes, industries were able to manufacture more products at an economical rate. This resulted in an overall drop in the prices of products. For example, mechanization of production processes enabled 24-hour factory operation and thus the manufacture of more products.
In the Industrial Revolution period, society in general developed a thirst for knowledge and innovation. Renowned scholars carried out research in different scientific fields, resulting in new scientific proofs and inventions. These inventions are still used today in the fields of medicine, science and agriculture with minor improvisations. For example, the light bulb, the X-ray and the telephone were all invented during the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution paved the way for new inventions and designs. This led to an increase in the number of new factories and associated industries. Hence, more job opportunities were opened up in urban areas.
Because more people had access to jobs and business opportunities, overall quality of life increased. In this regard, larger populations of society could access quality education, modern housing, improved health services and faster transport services.
Negative Effects of the Industrial Revolution An increase in the number of factories in urban areas resulted in more air, water and land pollution. These industries operated without much government oversight and were not held accountable for their actions. Pollution exposed factory workers and the general population to health risks. Although companies work to reduce it, industrial pollution is still a major problem in the modern world. During the Industrial Revolution, factories and other employers were more profit oriented at the expense of employee safety and welfare. In this regard, it was not uncommon for employees to suffer serious but preventable accidents while on the production lines.
The Industrial Revolution caused mass migrations from rural areas to cities as people were in search of better jobs. The reduced labor workforce in rural areas could not sustain the demand for food coming from the local populations. In this regard, there was a perennial shortage of food due to reduced farming activities. The migration of people from rural areas to urban areas caused an oversupply of labor in some cities. Such an oversupply of labor prompted some employers to pay their employees low wages. In addition, employers exploited cheap child labor in order to maximize their profits. Even though the general population experienced improvements in its quality of life, some uneducated factory laborers lived in crowded slums with no basic amenities such as clean water. This resulted in the occasional outbreak of sanitation-related diseases.
Explanation:
pls mark brainliest
What was the social impact of the decision in Brown v. Board of Education?
A) It increased support for segregation by business owners.
B) It strengthened the growing civil rights movement.
C) It reduced interest in public protest relating to civil rights issues.
D) It generated interest in the link between grades and emotions.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The main social impact of the result of Brown v. Board of Education was that B) It strengthened the growing civil rights movement.
Brown v. Board of EducationWas a Supreme Court case based on segregation in education. Resulted in the Supreme Court declaring that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.This gave a massive boost to the Civil Rights movement as they then began to argue that if segregation was unconstitutional in education, it should be unconstitutional across the board.
Find out more on Brown v. Board of Education at https://brainly.com/question/9857823.
The country's first and only threatened military coup was the:
a. Newburgh Conspiracy.
b. American Revolution.
c. Shay's Rebellion.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
because i know
Who was the 19 president
Answer:
It has to have been Rutherford B. Hayes.
Explanation:
It has been said that he was the 19th president of the United States in 1877-1881.
Note to you:
Hope this helped and have a good one!
✍(◔◡◔)Did the U.S. Government and the states appreciate and respect the Constitution?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
They love them to
The Bessemer process was a method of producing cheap
a. Oil
b. Steel
C. Electricity
d. Cotton cloth
Which type of business is the most common in the U.S.?!
Answer:
Sole Proprietorship
Explanation:
A sole proprietorship is the most common form of business organization.
What are the duties of the secretary of state of Louisiana? Check all that apply.
act as the chief legal officer of the state
serve as chief election officer
take responsibility for official state records
keep the Great Seal of the State of Louisiana
give official approval of documents
THE ANSWERS ARE B,C,D,E
Answer:
All of them but "give official approval doc"
Explanation:
do hope this helps.
Answer:
The answer is ADE
A(defending the laws of the state in court)
D(serving as the head of the Department of Justice)
E(advising or assisting on criminal cases as needed)
Explanation:
The attorney is head of LEGAL officer of state.
I used guided notes and got this question right.
Mostly an agricultural region with work done by slaves
A. North
B. South
Why did the freedom granted to the serfs in Russia by Alexander II have negative results?
Alexander II gave land to only the nobles.
Old landlords hoard the good, fertile land; freed farmers could grow very little on their new lands.
The serfs wanted more after receiving their land.
Freed farmers could grow very little on their new lands.
All of these.
Answer:
Old landlords hoard the good, fertile land; freed farmers could grow very little on their new lands.
Explanation:
You wrote the awnser in the question
13 Points! Please help ASAP^^
Please match the word to the correct definition.
Question 1 options:
is a person that is accused of committing a crime or a person against whom some type of civil relief is being sought in a civil case.
legal reasons, stated in court session, in written and/ or verbal form, based on statutes, regulations, case precedents, and reasoning applied to the facts of the particular situation.
means to be in accordance with the rules, laws, and rights presented in a governing document called a constitution
the official power (of a court) to be able to hear cases and make legal decisions and judgements
The highest ranking or senior member of the court, they preside over the court in its public sessions when the court is hearing arguments of a case and during its private conferences when discussing and deciding cases.
the person who is accusing another person, or a group of some wrongdoing and is bring the suit to court.
the highest judicial court in a state or a country. Is the highest court in the US
comes from the Latin word for city, because in earlier history people identified themselves as belong to cities. It is a legal status that gives you a right to live, work, pay taxes, and vote
anything that a person (or a business) has legal title over. They can be tangible or intangible and ownership give the owner enforceable rights
means to be in violation of one or more of the rules, laws, and/ or rights presented in a governing document called a constitution
a conclusion reached after an evaluation of the facts and the precedent, and law. It is also called a ruling, an opinion, or a judgement.
1.
Property
2.
Citizenship
3.
Supreme Court
4.
Jurisdiction
5.
Plaintiff
6.
Defendant
7.
Chief Justice
8.
Arguments
9.
Decision
10.
Constitutional
11.
Unconstitutional
Answer:
Appellate brief
An appellate brief is a written legal argument presented to an appellate court. Its purpose is to persuade the higher court to uphold or reverse the trial court’s decision. Briefs of this kind are therefore geared to presenting the issues involved in the case from the perspective of one side only.
Appellate briefs from both sides can be very valuable to anyone assessing the legal issues raised in a case. Unfortunately, they are rarely published. The U.S. Supreme Court is the only court for which briefs are regularly available in published form. The Landmark Briefs series (REF. LAW KF 101.9 .K8) includes the full texts of briefs relating to a very few of the many cases heard by this court. In addition, summaries of the briefs filed on behalf of the plaintiff or defendant for all cases reported are included in the U.S. Supreme Court Reports. Lawyer’s Ed., 2nd. series (REF. LAW KF 101 .A42).
Student brief
A student brief is a short summary and analysis of the case prepared for use in classroom discussion. It is a set of notes, presented in a systematic way, in order to sort out the parties, identify the issues, ascertain what was decided, and analyze the reasoning behind decisions made by the courts.
Although student briefs always include the same items of information, the form in which these items are set out can vary. Before committing yourself to a particular form for briefing cases, check with your instructor to ensure that the form you have chosen is acceptable.
The parties and how to keep track of them
Beginning students often have difficulty identifying relationships between the parties involved in court cases. The following definitions may help:
Plaintiffs sue defendants in civil suits in trial courts.
The government (state or federal) prosecutes defendants in criminal cases in trial courts.
The losing party in a criminal prosecution or a civil action may ask a higher (appellate) court to review the case on the ground that the trial court judge made a mistake. If the law gives the loser the right to a higher court review, his or her lawyers will appeal. If the loser does not have this right, his or her lawyers may ask the court for a writ of certiorari. Under this procedure, the appellate court is being asked to exercise its lawful discretion in granting the cases a hearing for review.
For example, a defendant convicted in a federal district court has the right to appeal this decision in the Court of Appeals of the circuit and this court cannot refuse to hear it. The party losing in this appellate court can request that the case be reviewed by the Supreme Court, but, unless certain special circumstances apply, has no right to a hearing.
These two procedures, appeals and petitions for certiorari, are sometimes loosely grouped together as “appeals.” However, there is, as shown, a difference between them, and you should know it.
A person who seeks a writ of certiorari, that is, a ruling by a higher court that it hear the case, is known as a petitioner. The person who must respond to the petition, that is, the winner in the lower court, is called the respondent.
A person who files a formal appeal demanding appellate review as a matter of right is known as the appellant. His or her opponent is the appellee.
The name of the party initiating the action in court, at any level on the judicial ladder, always appears first in the legal papers. For example, Arlo Tatum and others sued in Federal District Court for an injunction against Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird and others to stop the Army from spying on them. Tatum and his friends became plaintiffs and the case was then known as Tatum v. Laird. The Tatum group lost in the District Court and appealed to the Court of Appeals, where they were referred to as the appellants, and the defendants became the appellees. Thus the case was still known at Tatum v. Laird.
When Tatum and his fellow appellants won in the Court of Appeals, Laird and his fellow appellees decided to seek review by the Supreme Court. They successfully petitioned for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court directing the Court of Appeals to send up the record of the case (trial court transcript, motion papers, and assorted legal documents) to the Supreme Court.
At this point the name of the case changed to Laird v. Tatum: Laird and associates were now the petitioners, and Tatum and his fellows were the respondents. Several church groups and a group of former intelligence agents obtained permission to file briefs (written arguments) on behalf of the respondents to help persuade the Court to arrive at a decision favorable to them. Each of these groups was termed an amicus curiae, or “friend of the court.”
In criminal cases, switches in the titles of cases are common, because most reach the appellate courts as a result of an appeal by a convicted defendant. Thus, the case ofArizona v. Miranda later became Miranda v. Arizona.
Student briefs
Explanation:
King George III of England is known famously as the 'mad king,' but what mental illness or illnesses did he possibly suffer from?
Answer:
he suffered from acute porphyria wich was a genetic blood disorder, and bipolar disorder
Explanation:
sources www.express.co.uk and www.history.com hope this helps
1. Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) may still be in danger from their government.
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Displaced persons suffer significantly higher rates of mortality than the general population. They also remain at high risk of physical attack, sexual assault and abduction, and frequently are deprived of adequate shelter, food and health services.
Please help me and write an essay for me about this !! i will give u 100 points
6. The Cold War was the ideological, political, and economic conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union following World War II. During the Cold War, each country tried to limit the other country's influence around the world by building nuclear weapons, supplying weapons and money to other countries to gain their support, and spreading false information about the other. While the two countries never came into direct, open conflict with each other, they did come into indirect conflict numerous times. This included the Cuban Missile Crisis, when the world seemed on the edge of a nuclear war.
A historian has made the claim that too much is being made of the Cold War and that it was never a significant threat to world peace, as proven by the fact that the United States and the Soviet Union never went to war.
Read these excerpts from speeches given by Nikita Khrushchev, Fidel Castro, and John F. Kennedy during the Cold War. Use the information from the three passages to write a historical essay that responds to the historian's claim. Be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a thesis, body paragraphs with at least three pieces of evidence supporting your thesis, a counterclaim to your thesis, and a refutation of that counterclaim. Finally, include a conclusion paragraph restating your thesis and the evidence supporting it.
Passage 1: Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev addressed the UN Assembly in 1960 after U.S. military aircraft allegedly entered Soviet airspace.
We saw a dangerous manifestation of the work of these forces last spring when the aircraft of one of the largest States Members of the United Nations, the United States of America, treacherously invaded the air space of the Soviet Union and that of other States. What is more, the United States has elevated such violations of international law into a principle of deliberate State policy. The aggressive intrusion into our country by a United States aircraft and the whole course of the United States Government's subsequent behaviour showed the peoples that they were dealing with a calculated policy on the part of the United States Government, which was trying to substitute brigandage for international law and treachery for honest negotiations between sovereign and equal States.3
Passage 2: Cuban prime minister Fidel Castro made a speech in 1961 after the United States sponsored the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, a Soviet ally.
Our position is that we will fight to the last man, but we do not want direct aggression. We do not wish to suffer the destruction that aggression would bring. If the aggression comes, it will meet the total resistance of our people.
. . . They are the ones who are bringing the world to the brink of war through their warlike spirit, their own contradictions, and their economic problems which cause them to provoke a series of crises in order to maintain their war economy. Their factories run only when they are building war material. Their regime is marching toward a crisis. It is not like our economy, which is perfectly planned.4
Passage 3: U.S. president John F. Kennedy addressed the United States after it was discovered that the Soviet Union had placed nuclear weapons in Cuba, just 70 miles from the U.S. border.
I want to take this opportunity to report on the conclusions which this Government has reached on the basis of yesterday's aerial photographs which will be made available tomorrow, as well as other indications, namely, that the Soviet missile bases in Cuba are being dismantled, their missiles and related equipment are being crated, and the fixed installations at these sites are being destroyed.
go to:
https: // www. j f k li brary. o r g /sites/ default/ files/ 2018-06/Bay _ of _ Pigs -Lesson _ Plan . p d f